تعويض دريچه ائورت: مقايسه روش متداول و روش جديد

Aortic valve replacement: conventional versus authorsʹ offered method

Background: The usage of pericardium of patient himself, for support of anastomosis lines may carry benefits in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with pulmonary autograft (Ross). The aim of the present study was to compare the short term results of aortic valve replacement with pulmonary autograft with routine and offered methods. Methods: In a non-randomized clinical trial, 64 patients who referred to cardiac surgery ward of Imam Khomeini hospital Tehran Iran from December 2002 to December 2006 for aortic valve replacement with pulmonary autograft with two different methods. In the first two years of this study all of the patients were operated with routine procedure (group A, n=28) and during the next two years, all of them were operated with authorsʹ offered method in which the patient`s pericardium was used for support of anastomosis lines (group B, n=36). Some of clinical parameters and outcome were compared between two groups. Results: There were no significant differences between mean of age, sex, pathology, preoperative and postoperative EF in two groups. In group B, the mean pump time was significantly lower than group A (144.09±26 vs. 179.64±25 min). The mean Cross-clamp time was significantly lower in group B (118.5±22 vs. 136.93±19 min) Need for blood transfusion in ICU was significantly lower in group B (35.71% vs. 68.57%). Mean ICU Stay and Postoperative Hospital Stay were significantly lower in group B (1.3±0.3 vs. 1.9±0.7 and 5.2±0.9 vs. 5.9±1.5 days respectively). Overall mortality was four death (6.25%) which was not significant between two groups. Conclusions: The usage of patientʹs pericardium for support of anastomosis lines in patients undergoing aortic root replacement with pulmonary autograft carry advantages to routine procedure and its utilization is advocated in other centers