عنوان مقاله :
معيارهاي ويژه ي ارزيابي پژوهش كيفي
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
Criteria of Evaluating Qualitative Research
پديد آورندگان :
صدوقي، مجيد نويسنده - Sadooghi, M
اطلاعات موجودي :
فصلنامه سال 1387 شماره 56
كليدواژه :
validity , alternative evaluative criteria , پژوهش كيفي , معيارهاي بديل ارزيابي , ارزيابي , روش شناسي , Methodology , Qualitative research , Reliability , generalisability
چكيده لاتين :
For qualitative research, judgment about integrity of research process and
quality of final product requires different evaluative criteria from
quantitative research. Qualitative researchers object to and reject the criteria
used by quantitative researchers when evaluating their work. Instead,
qualitative researchers have developed alternative criteria in response to their
specific research ideals.
This article includes a consideration of the notion of approach and its impact
on the subject matter of science; a criterion besides quantification that
implicitly underpin all conceptions of science, and entails reframing the
notions of internal and external validity and reliability within qualitative
research.
The article attempts to show how researchers choose from these alternatives
and that the selected criteria should be compatible with the nature of the
research in question (its methodology, aims and assumptions).
عنوان نشريه :
روش شناسي علوم انساني
عنوان نشريه :
روش شناسي علوم انساني
اطلاعات موجودي :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 56 سال 1387
كلمات كليدي :
#تست#آزمون###امتحان