بررسي كنش هاي گفتار در سخنراني هاي روساي جمهور ايران و آمريكا شهريور 1385 ، سازمان ملل

Speech acts analysis on disconrse of president of Iran and USA: Sbabrivar 1385 in UN

The goal of this article is the analysis of the speech of two politicians according to the theory of the speech acts in the United Nations. In this article, the discoursal analysis through speech acts theory has been down on discourse of presidents of Iran and USA (Shahrival 1385) in the United Nations. After the development of the subject in the introduction, the speech acts are defined and the classification of the speech acts, according to Searle is presented. Thereafter, we analyzed the speeches of Ahmadinejad and Bush; and we compared the results. While benefitting from the withdrawn results and the situation of the two presidents; according to the analysis of the speech acts; we can say that the cause of the use of this political language in the United Nations; is the hope to transmit and influence on the other presidents by their messages. Half of the speech of the president of Iran is devoted to express his ideas and half of the speech of the president of the United States is giving a report of his actions as a world power.