عنوان مقاله :
بررسي اثر روش قراردهي گلاس آينومر بر ريزنشت ترميمهاي ساندويچ CI II
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
Influence of different GI restorative techniques on microleakage of Cl II sandwich restorations
پديد آورندگان :
قوام نصيري، مرجانه نويسنده گروه آموزشي ترميمي و زيبايي دانشكده دندانپزشكي و مركز تحقيقات دندانپزشكي دانشگاه علوم پزشكي مشهد Ghavamnasiri, M , حاجي زاده، هيلا نويسنده دانشكده دندانپزشكي-دانشگاه علوم پزشكي مشهد Hajizadeh, Hila , سرابي، نسرين نويسنده گروه آموزش ترميمي-دانشكده دندانپزشكي دانشگاه علوم پزشكي مشهد Sarabi, Nasrin , علي زاده، مهياره نويسنده - Alizadeh, Mahyareh
اطلاعات موجودي :
فصلنامه سال 1387 شماره 68
كليدواژه :
كف جينجيوال , ريزنشت , گلاس آينومر , ترميم Cl II , تكنيك ساندويچ
چكيده لاتين :
Background & Aim: Sandwich technique with glass ionomer (GI) has been recommended to overcome gingival microleakage. The study objectives were to compare open and closed sandwich techniques and evaluate GI injection in sandwich restorations.
Materials & Methods: Sixty extracted sound premolar teeth were divided into 4 groups (n=15). A Class II cavity with gingival margin below CEJ was prepared on each tooth. Teeth were restored using glass ionomer (Fuji II LC), adhesive (Single Bond) and resin composite (Z250) as follows: Group 1, Open sandwich, GI injection Group 2, Open sandwich, placing GI by a probe Group 3, Closed sandwich, GI injection Group 4, Closed sandwich technique, placing GI by a probe. Dye penetration was performed by using fushin after thermocycling. Teeth were sectioned then dye penetration was evaluated (0-3 scores) under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis was conducted using Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.
Results: The least microleakage was observed in closed sandwich technique with GI injection and the most microleakage was observed in open sandwich using GI by a probe. When comparing the handling techniques, it was shown that using a syringe was significantly better than using a probe (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between open and closed sandwich techniques although the mean dye penetration happened less in closed technique.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, injection of GI into cavity is recommended because of better access and superior adaptation of GI with cavity walls.
عنوان نشريه :
دندانپزشكي - جامعه اسلامي داندانپزشكان
عنوان نشريه :
دندانپزشكي - جامعه اسلامي داندانپزشكان
اطلاعات موجودي :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 68 سال 1387
كلمات كليدي :
#تست#آزمون###امتحان