كليدواژه :
ملارجبعلي تبريزي , قاضي سعيد قمي , ملاصدرا , نفس , منتقدان
چكيده لاتين :
Mulla Sadraʹs philosophical psychology has been criticized by Mulla Rajab-Ali Tabrizi and Qadi Saʹid Qumi. Tabrizi believes that Nafs is either in need of matter from the outset or it does not need it. If it needs matter for its origination, it should be material all the way, and is incapable of becoming immaterial; but if it is not material at the outset, therefore, it is immaterial whether by the time of its origination or in its survival. He argues that there is no third option according to which, nafs is material in the beginning and then becomes immaterial.
According to the author of this article, Tabriziʹs rejection of Mulla Sadra is based on lack of deep understanding of the principles of the Transcendental Philosophy of Mulla Sadra. This is also the case with Qadi Saʹid Qumi, who accepted the unity of the Knower and the known, the unity of the imaginer and the imagined, and the unity of the sensor and the sensed, on the one hand, and rejected the primacy of existence, the gradation of existence, and substantial motion, on the other! Most of his arguments are rhetorical.
