عنوان مقاله :
جداسازي كروم از محيطهاي آبي با استفاده از دو نوع پليآنيلين
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
Removal of Chromium from Aqueous Solution Using Two Kinds of
Polyaniline
پديد آورندگان :
رياحي ساماني ، مجيد نويسنده rayahi samani, majid , برقعي، سيدمهدي نويسنده استاد دانشكده مهندسي شيمي و نفت، دانشگاه صنعتي شريف تهران barghei, mahdi , اولاد، علي نويسنده استاديار شيمي كاربردي، دانشكده شيمي، دانشگاه تبريز olad, ali , چاييچي، محمدجواد نويسنده استاديار شيمي تجزيه، دانشكده علوم پايه، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر chayichi, mohammad javad
اطلاعات موجودي :
فصلنامه سال 1389 شماره 55
كليدواژه :
جذب سطحي , كروم , آلودگي محيط زيست , احياي , پليآنيلين
چكيده فارسي :
در اين پژوهش دو نوع پليآنيلين با استفاده از دو نوع اكسنده شامل پتاسيم يدات و آمونيوم پروكسيديسولفات در حلال اسيدي آبي به روش شيميايي سنتز شدهاند و به صورت پودر براي جداسازي و احياي كروم( 6+) در محيط آبي استفاده شدهاند. آزمايشها به صورت رآكتور ناپيوسته انجام شدهاند و مشخصههايي چون زمان تماس پليمر با محيط آبي حاوي كروم،pH محلول كروم و همدماهاي فروندليچ و لانگموير در جذب بررسي شدهاند. سازوكار حذف كروم براي هر دو نوع پليآنيلين تركيبي از جذب سطحي و احياي كروم بيان شد. پليآنيلين سنتز شده با استفاده از پتاسيم يدات عملكرد بهتري در جذب كروم كل و پليآنيلين سنتز شده با استفاده از آمونيوم پروكسي دي سولفات در جذب و احياي كروم( 6+) دارد. براي هر دو نوع پليآنيلين تهيه شده زمان بهينه حذف كروم كل در حد 30 دقيقه و زمان بهينه حذف كروم (6+) در حد 5 دقيقه محاسبه شد. پليآنيلين سنتز شده با استفاده از پتاسيم يدات بيشترين درصد حذف كروم كل را در pH برابر 3 و پليآنيلين سنتز شده با استفاده از آمونيوم پروكسي دي سولفات بيشترين درصد حذف كروم كل را در pH برابر 11 از خود نشان داده اند. هر دو پلي آنيلين بيشترين در صد حذف( كروم 6+ ) را در pH هاي اسيدي و بويژه در pH برابر 1 داشتهاند. هر دو نوع پليآنيلين سنتز شده مطابقت قابل قبولي با همدماهاي لانگموير و فروندليچ در جذب كروم داشتهاند. علت تفاوت عملكرد دو نوع پليمر، تاثير نوع ماده اكسنده بر شكل و مرفولوژي پليمر و چيدمان وتعداد گروههاي نيتروژن در پليآنيلين بيان شد.
چكيده لاتين :
Introduction
New group of polymers have been synthesized that are electricity conductive. Therefore, they are called conducting polymers. These so-called artificial metals have interesting optical and electrical properties. One of the most conductive polymers is "polyaniline" that is synthesized easily at low cost and with excellent environmental stability. Polyaniline is synthesized chemically and electrochemically in the shape of powder and film. The synthesis condition is noticeably effective on the properties of the produced polyaniline. Reaction temperature, molar ratio of aniline/oxidant, types and concentration of oxidant used in synthesis, will influence the morphology and conductivity of polyaniline. In this paper, Absorptive characteristics of polyaniline synthesized with two different oxidants including potassium iodate and ammonium persulfate has been studied. Materials and Methods
Sulfuric acid, potassium iodate, and aniline were all provided by "Merck Chemical Company". Chemicals were used without any purification, with the exception of aniline which was distilled under vacuum condition prior to use. In this study polyaniline was chemically synthesized by oxidizing aniline monomer under acidic aqueous conditions (1M H2S04) using ammonium persulfate and potassium iodate as an initiator of oxidative polymerization. Synthesized polyanilines in powder shape is used as an adsorbent to remove toxic hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions. Experiments were conducted in batch mode. Batch experiments were carried out by contacting 100 ml of hexavalent chromium contaminated solution with predetermined quantities of polyaniline added to it.
To achieve the degree of mixing required for equilibrium concentration, a magnetic stirrer was employed with a speed adjusted at 300 rpm. Solution pH was ranged from 1-11, fixed by addition of 0.1M NaOH and 0.1N H2SO4. After different exposure times, chromium solutions were filtered and filtrates were used for measurement of total and hexavalent chromium concentration.
The efficiency of total and hexavalent chromium removal has been calculated according to the Equation (1): R= 1 OO(Co-Ce)/Co (1)
Where C0 is the initial concentration of chromium in solution and Ce is the concentration of chromium after a certain time of exposure with various amounts of polyaniline. powder (the equilibrium concentration).
Corresponding author: Tel: 09131815973 E-mail: Majidriahisamani@gmail.com
Discussion of Results
Results show that polyaniline has a removal efficiency of about three times more than powder activated carbon. When polyaniline was used, total and hexavalent chromium removal rates were not equal. It means that after having a contact time between polyaniline and Cr(VI) solutions, Cr(III) appears in solutions, which indicates that polyaniline is responsible for reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III). Another mechanism is the surface adsorption. It is well known that the nitrogen atom in polyaniline makes co-ordinate bond with positive charge of metals due to the presence of electron in sp3 orbit of nitrogen. This co-ordinate bond is the plausible mechanism for adsorption of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) from solution by polyaniline molecules. Synthesized polyaniline with potassium iodate and ammonium persulfate have different Cr(III) and Cr(VI) removal efficiency. The types of oxidant can affect the capacity of polyaniline molecules for removal of chromium. SEM micrographs of synthesized polyaniline with potassium iodate and ammonium persulfate show that the type of oxidant affects surface morphology of synthesized polyaniline (Figures 1, 2). This variation of polyaniline surfaces affects the capacity of prepared polyaniline for chromium removal due to changes of interface between polyaniline and chromium solution.
Fig. 1: SEM micrograph (x8000) of synthesized polyaniline with potassium iodate
Fig. 2: SEM micrograph (*8000) of synthesized polyaniline with ammonium persulfate
The equilibrium times for total and hexavalent chromium removal were respectively within 30 and 5 minutes for two kinds of polyaniline. Solution pH is another important parameter during adsorption process since it reflects the nature of the physicochemical interaction of the species in solution and the adsorptive site of adsorbent. So in this research the effect of pH on adsorption of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) by polyaniline was investigated to find the optimum pH for maximum removal efficiency.
The optimum pH for total chromium removal was 3, 11 for synthesized polyaniline with potassium iodate and ammonium persulfate respectively. Under acidic conditions, especially in a highly acidic environment (pH 1) high rate of Cr (VI) adsorption was observed. At acidic pHs the surface of polyaniline is high protonated. The protonated form of polyaniline can form bond with chromate and dichromate anions by electrostatic attraction for high adsorption of Cr(VI) to occur. It is worthwhile to mention that, the oxidizing power of Cr (VI) component increases with decreasing pH. Therefore, reduction process improves under acidic pH using polyaniline.
In order to model the sorption behavior, adsorption isotherms were studied at room temperature. Both Langmuir and Freundlich equations were tested to find the most suitable isotherm model. Langmuir and Fruendlich equations are respectively defined as Equation 2 and 3. The linear form of Fruendlich equation can be shown as Equation (4).
1/X= l/Xm + (l/b)(l/Ce)
(2)
x/m=kCe1/n
(3)
log (x/m) = log k + 1/n log (Ce) (4)
Investigating the isothermal characteristics showed that the equilibrium adsorption data for polyaniline fitted both Freundlichʹs and Langmuirʹs isotherms. Table 1 shows the calculated k, n, b and Xm constants. For a suitable sorbents, constant n in Freundlich equation is normally between 1 and 10. These results indicate that two kinds of polyaniline can be used as good adsorbents for removal of chromium in solutions. The maximum adsorption of total chromium was calculated 24.44 mg/g and 20.83 mg/g for synthesized polyaniline with potassium iodate and ammonium per sulfate respectively.
During desorption experiments for two kinds of polyaniline about 30% and 65 % of total chromium were released in the solution by using 0.2M NaOH and 0.1M HN03 respectively.
Table 1: Comparison of Freundlich and Langmuir constant values for polyaniline
HHhhhiIMWBHHHMK
polyaniline Synthesized with potassium iodate 1.43 0.22 0.07 24.44
polyaniline Synthesized with ammonium persulfate 2 0.92 0.19 20.83
Conclusions
The type of oxidant used in preparation of polymer has a noticeable effect on the capacity of chemically synthesized polyaniline in powder shape for removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions. Removal mechanism involving polyaniline is the combination of surface adsorption and reduction reaction. Synthesized polyaniline made using potassium iodate had a good performance for total chromium removal, while synthesized polyaniline with ammonium persulfate had the good performance for hexavalent chromium removal. Finally it must also be reflected that synthesized polyaniline can play a major role in removing chromium ions from industrial effluents, with higher efficiencies than activated carbon. Key words
عنوان نشريه :
محيط شناسي
عنوان نشريه :
محيط شناسي
اطلاعات موجودي :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 55 سال 1389
كلمات كليدي :
#تست#آزمون###امتحان