برخورد متشرعان اسلامي و فلاسفه با مساله عرفان

Confrontation of Islamic Shariah Scholars and Philosophers with Mysticism

از ديرباز عرفان و تصو?ف مورد حملات شديد متشرعان ديني و در برخي موارد با تعرّضات فلاسفه روبرو شده است و چه از لحاظ برخورد تيوريكي، چه از لحاظ فيزيكي، بي مهري فراواني را متحمل گرديد، كه ركود ظاهري عرفان را در ادوار مختلف شاهد هستيم، اما در اين بين برخي متشرعان ديني و فلاسفه ديدگاه هاي دوگان هاي با پديده عرفان داشته اند و كما في الس?ابق دارند ولي اغلب موارد علي رغم مخالفت شديد با عرفان، انديشه هاي عارفانه را پشتوانه قدرت تفكر خويش ساخته و نه تنها از آن سود جسته، بلكه جهت تكامل بخشيدن به انديشه هاي فلسفي و ديني خويش دست به اصلاحات مفيدي زده اند، نوش ته حاضر در جهت شناساندن پي رنگ عرفان و عوامل م بارزات شريعت با طريقت و بيان ديدگاه هاي دوگانه متشرعان و فلاسفه ترتيب يافته است كه در خلال آن به نظريات برخي فقها و فيلسوفان به ظاهر مخالف كه متابعت از انديشه ها عرفاني را سرلوحه ضمير خويش ساخت ه اند را بيان مي كند.

Mysticism and Sufism have always been assailed from the past by religious sharia scholars and in some cases by philosophers, and either theoretically or physically they have borne a lot of hostilities so that an apparent decline of mysticism is seen during various periods. But in this regards, some sharia scholars and philosophers took a dual viewpoints towards mysticism and as in the past they are still holding their position but in most cases despite their disagreement with mysticism they have made mystical thoughts as the backbone of their thinking process and not only have they utilized that but also have they made useful improvement to evolve their philosophical and religious mentalities. This paper is made up to identify mysticism and the causes of the campaign between sharia and manner and explaining the dual views of sharia scholars and philosophers. Marginal to that, the theories of some religious scholars and philosophers apparently against mysticism that have made mystical thoughts as their inner natures are explained.