مواجهه گفتماني ايران و امريكا؛ از بيدار ي اسلامي تا اشغال وال استريت

Dialogue between Iran and the US: from the Islamic Awakening to Occupy Wall Street

ايالات متحده نه تنها نتوانست وقوع انقلاب هاي خاورميانه را پيش بيني كند بلكه در درك عمق و احتمال تسري آن به ديگر كشورها نيز ناكام بود. در زماني كه واشينگتن در مواجهه با بيداري اسلامي مشغول اقدامات تاكتيكي بود جمهوري اسلامي ايران ابتكار عمل يك بازي استراتژيك را در دست گرفت. اين امر گفتماني سه مرحله اي بود كه توسط رهبر معظم انقلاب مطرح شد. با طرح گفتمان جمهوري اسلامي، امريكا در برابر ايران قرار گرفت و شاهد بروز يك گفتمان دو قطبي درباره انقلاب هاي منطقه بين ايران و امريكا بوديم. همچنين واشينگتن تلاش كرد اين گفتمان را در منطقه تضعيف كند. بدين ترتيب هر دو طرف با ورود به يك مواجهه گفتماني، قدرت نرم يكديگر را به چالش كشيدند. اين مقاله با بررسي مراحل اين مواجهه تلاش مي كند برداشت هريك از طرفين از اين واقعيت و تلاش آنها براي بازنمايي آن را در خارج تبيين كند.

The US, not only failed to predict the occurrence of the Middle East revolutions but also failed to understand the depth and the probability of its spread to other countries. While Washington was engaged in tactical initiatives in confronting the Islamic Awakening, the Islamic republic of Iran took the creativity of a strategic game in hand. This was a three-step profile raised by the supreme leader of the Islamic revolution. In the first phase the dialogue was related to the definition of the identity of the revolutions in the region where Islam was considered as the inspiring factor and Islam-seeking as its wish. The second step focused on the geographic direction of the spread of these revolutions and in the third stage, with emphasis on the common factor of Zionism in the occurrence of the revolutions in the region and the Occupy Wall Street movement, mixed these two movements. By raising the Islamic republic dialogue, the US positioned against Iran and we see a bipolar dialogue on the revolutions of the region between Iran and the US. Washington also tried to undermine this dialogue in the region. Thus both sides, entering a dialogic confront, challenged each other’s soft power. This paper tries to express each side’s understanding of this reality and their attempt to represent it outside, by analyzing the stages of this confrontation.