تبييني از مباني نظري انديشه مرجعيت زدايي اخلاقي پسا ساختارگرا و نقد آن

An Explanation of the Theoretical Foundations of Post-structuralism Attempt against the referential authority of Ethics (A Critical View)

اين مقاله ضمن توصيف و توضيح روند ظهور و بروز انديشه مرجعيت زدايي در اخلاق در بستر انديشه هاي فلسفي غرب با تاكيد بر رويكرد پساساختارگرايي به تبيين مقوله مرجعيت زدايي با معرفي سه تجلي "ايده، متن و شخص" به عنوان صورتهاي مرجعيت اخلاقي پرداخته، پيامدهاي مرجعيت زدايي اخلاقي را مورد نقد قرار مي دهد. براورد پژوهش اين است كه نگاه هاي نسبي گرايانه به ارزش، موجب تزلزل در استحكام مرجعيت اخلاقي مي شود؛ اما به نفي مطلق مرجعيت نمي انجامد در حالي كه نگاه كثرت گراي پساساختارگرايي با نشانه گرفتن بنيان ارزشها به ساختارشكني از مرجعيت مي پردازد و مرجعيت اخلاقي را از اساس ويران مي سازد

Nowadays, disbelief in and noncommitment to the authority of human values, the dedication to which is essential for sustaining human values, is one of the most important factors causing rupture between the norm and behavior in all human societies. Hence, paying attention to the issue of fighting the authority of ethical values can be regarded as the consideration of one of the most important foundations of ethical crisis being disregarded in spite of its importance. While explaining the process of the emergence of attempts against the referential authority of ethics in Western structural philosophical thoughts, three components of this attempt, including idea, context, and person, will be explained. The outcome of this attempt will be discussed in the end. this research hypothesizes that relative approach toward values results in a unsteadiness in the authority of ethics, while not removing it completely. Pluralistic views of post-structuralism aiming at the basis of ethical values, and trying to demolish the norms of ethical referential authority is an attempt against ethical referential authority.