تاملي در يك نقد

A Reflection on a Criticism

محقق دواني «موجود بودن» به‏معناي «تحقق عيني داشتن» را منحصر در ذات حضرت حق‏تعالي، و ماسوي‏اللّه را منسوب به حق مي‏داند و با اين حساب، مجعول در نظر وي ماهيت است. ملّاصدرا مبنا و بناي او را نقد كرده است. با اين‏همه به نظر مي‏رسد نظريه محقق دواني با نظريه نهايي ملّاصدرا در باب توحيد حق يكي است و مطالب محقق دواني پذيراي تفسير صحيح است؛ زيرا با قبول وحدت شخصي وجود، جعل به وجود تعلق نمي‏گيرد، بلكه ماهيات ظهور مي‏يابند و ماسوي‏اللّه ظهورات حق‏تعالي هستند و همه منسوب به حضرت حق‏اند و اصالت ماهيت يعني مجعول ماهيت است، نه اينكه ماهيات تحقق عيني خارجي دارند در كنار وجود حق.

Confining "being existent" in the sense of "having objective realization" to the essence of Almighty God and attributing all other than God to Him, Muhaqqiq Dawani considers quiddity as the made one. Mulla Sdra has criticized his foundation and principles. However, it seems that the theory of Muhaqqiq Davani is the same as the final theory of Mulla Sadra concerning the unity of Allah. Thus Muhaqqiq Davani’s views are susceptible of true interpretation, since in case of accepting the particular unity of existence, existence cannot be subject to making. However, quiddities would have manifestations and all other than God are considered manifestations of Almighty God attributed to Him. Principality of quiddity requires that the made one is quiddity rather than requiring quiddities to have external and objective realization next to Almighty God