بررسي رابطه ميان سرمايه اجتماعي و فرهنگ سياسي دانشجويان مطالعه موردي: دانشگاه اصفهان

Study of relation between social investment and student political culture Case study: Isfahan University

تداوم مشاركت سياسي دانشجويان يكي از مهم‏ترين مسايل براي نظام جمهوري اسلامي ايران در دهه چهارم حيات سياسي خود مي باشد. به نظر مي رسد كه يكي از عوامل تاثيرگذار بر مشاركت سياسي دانشجويان، نوع فرهنگ سياسي آنهاست؛ در شكل گيري فرهنگ سياسي عوامل متعددي نقش دارند كه سرمايه اجتماعي يكي از مهم‏ترين آنهاست. بنابراين، با توجه به چنين پيشينه اي، محور اصلي مقاله حاضر تبيين رابطه سرمايه اجتماعي و فرهنگ سياسي دانشجويان در ايران است. روش تحقيق پيمايش، ابزار گردآوريِ اطلاعات، پرسش‌نامه و جامعه آماري آن، دانشجويان كارشناسي‏ارشد دانشگاه اصفهان است كه تعداد 120 نفر از آنان به شيوه تصادفي سيستماتيك براي اين مطالعه انتخاب شده‏اند. نتايج حاصل از ضريب همبستگي نشان مي دهد كه بين متغير ميزان انسجام اجتماعي با فرهنگ سياسي محدود (38/0- r=)، مشاركتي (42/0r= ) و تبعي (16/0- =r)، همچنين ميان متغير امنيت اجتماعي با فرهنگ سياسي محدود (19/0- r=)، تبعي (14/0- r=) و مشاركتي (29/0=r) رابطه وجود دارد.

Continuation of students political participation is one of the most important problems for Iran Islamic Republic System in forth decade of its political age. It seems that one of the influential factors to students’ political participation is type of their political culture؛ several factors play role in formation of political culture, social investment is one of the most important of them. So according to this background, original base of the present study, address relation between social investment and students’ political culture in Iran. Methodology of the paper is based on survey, and through questionnaire data has been collected. Statistical population is MA students at the University of Isfahan. 120 students have been selected through systematic random for the study. We applied facial validity for the evaluation of questions, Cronbach’s alpha for the reliability of questions, and Pearson’s correlation statistical method for examining the hypotheses. result show that There is a meaningful relationship between social integration and limited political culture(r=-0.38), participation political culture (0.42), Subject political culture (r=-0.16), and There is a meaningful relationship between social security and limited political culture(r=-0.19), participation political culture (0.29 Subject political culture (r=-0.14), and There is a meaningful relationship between social security and limited political culture(r=-0.25), participation political culture (0.56), depended political culture (r=-0.16). The result show that every measure of social investment exceeds the political culture in limited and conditioned dimensions goes down and in participation dimension goes up. It can be said that there is a significant and inverse relationship between social investment and limited and Subject political culture and there is significant and direct relationship between social investment and political participatory culture.