پديد آورندگان :
زياري ، كرامت الله نويسنده (استاد جغرافيا و برنامه ريزي شهري دانشگاه تهران) Ziyari, Karamatollah , ايستگلدي، مصطفي نويسنده دانشگاه فردوسي مشهد , , عباس زاده، غلام رضا نويسنده دانشجوي دكتري جغرافيا و برنامه ريزي شهري دانشگاه فردوسي مشهد Abbaszadeh, Gholam Reza
كليدواژه :
سرمايه اجتماعي , بافت مركزي مشهد , تحليل عاملي , مشاركت , Mashhad central region , SOCIAL CAPITAL , Factor Analysis , Participation
چكيده فارسي :
امروزه نظريه پردازان به منظور توسعه بر سرمايه اجتماعي تاكيد مي ورزند و از آن به عنوان يك متغير مهم براي تبيين تفاوت هاي اقتصادي و اجتماعي ميان سطوح فضايي مختلف ياد مي كنند. بافت مركزي شهرها نيز يكي از حوزه هاي مسيله برانگيز در برنامه ريزي شهري كشور است و براي توسعه و بهسازي آن، طرح ها و سياست هاي مختلفي آزموده شده اند كه همواره با مانع عدم مشاركت ساكنين بافت، مواجه شده اند كه ناشي از درنظرنگرفتن سرمايه اجتماعي است. بر اين اساس هدف مقاله حاضر، سنجش و اولويت بندي عامل هاي موثر بر سرمايه اجتماعي بافت مركزي شهرهاست كه بافت مركزي مشهد به عنوان نمونه مطالعاتي انتخاب شد. روش تحقيق تحليلي- توصيفي است و اطلاعات به وسيله پرسشنامه در بين نمونه 378 نفري از ساكنين بافت مركزي مشهد گردآوري شد. در اين مقاله فرآيند محاسبات براساس روش تحليل عاملي صورت گرفته است. بدين منظور 42 شاخص در ابعاد مختلف سرمايه اجتماعي انتخاب شدند و اين شاخص ها به 5 عامل تقليل يافتند كه 89 درصد واريانس را دربرداشتند. در بين 5 عامل برتر به ترتيب نسبت تاثيرگذاري، عامل مشاركت عمومي 2/24 درصد، آگاهي از حقوق شهروندي 89/22 درصد، اعتماد عمومي 35/22 درصد، اعتماد رسمي -56/16 درصد و مشاركت رسمي 9/2 درصد از واريانس را تبيين مي كنند. بنابراين آگاهي از عامل هاي موثر بر سرمايه اجتماعي در بافت مركزي مشهد و اولويت بندي آن، مي تواند زمينه برنامه ريزي براي توسعه سرمايه اجتماعي و مشاركت مردمي بيشتر در اين بافت را فراهم آورد.
چكيده لاتين :
Extended abstract
1- Introduction
Nowadays theorists consider social capital in addition to financial, physical and human capital for the development of any society, and describe it as the main factor and an important variable for the explanation of economic and social differences between different spatial levels. They discuss the lack of social capital as the major reason of inefficiency in planning policies and proposals. This consideration on the concept of social capital literature justifies its needs to be attached to planning and urban planning. The challenge of the central region of cities is one of the toughest issues in our country’s urban planning and there is always a trial and error process to develop and improve which always faces a barrier of residents negative response to participation derived from social capital. This article aims to assess and prioritize the factors that influence social capital in central region of cities and central region of Mashhad which is chosen as the case study.
2- Theoretical Framework
Theoretical framework of this study shows that there is a structural relationship between the three categories of social capital, social trust and participation. One of the main components of social capital and the major domain of participation is trust in such a way that Putnam regards it as a solution for the problem of collective cooperation. In other words, social capital is realized as a strong bilateral relationship between levels of civic participation and interpersonal trust so that the greater citizen participation in the community, the more they learn to trust one another. When trust between them is more, they are more likely to participate the in their communities. Moreover, people who trust each other tend to have more trust in government agencies. With this theoretical basis, the present study tries to analyze the factors affecting social capital in the central regions of metropolises (Case study: Mashhad central region). Centers that today need to participation to solve problems more than anything else.
3- Methodology
The research method is Descriptive-Analytic. The required data were gathered through questionnaires obtained from 378 residents from the central region of Mashhad using Cochran formula. In order to analysis the questionnaire items, a likert scale with responses ranging from 1 to 5 (very low, low, medium, high, and very high) was used. To validate the survey instrument (questionnaire) formal method credit was used. Selecting indices for estimating and measuring social capital was performed through three main components: trust (public institution), participation (formal, informal) and awareness (of civil rights). The calculations in this paper are based on the factor analysis technique. Therefore, 42 indicators in different dimensions of social capital were selected; which were then reduced to 5 main factors and included 89 percent of the variance.
3- Discussion
The study results indicated that in central region of Mashhad, subjective factors such as a public trust and public participation have a greater impact the concept of social capital central region Mashhad residents than objective factors such as official trust and official participation on. These findings reveal that to strengthen and enhance the social capital of central region of Mashhad subjective factors (public participation awareness of civil rights, public trust) are more important since the other factors (official trust and official participation) are under their influence.
4- Conclusion And Suggestion
According to the study results, the affective factors on Mashhad central region social capital was indicated a public participation with 24.2 percent, awareness of civil rights, official participation with 2.9 percent. In addition, the first three factors (official participation, awareness of civil rights, official trust) cover almost 70% of the variance. This shows that these three factors have the greatest impact on social capital in the central region of Mashhad. With regard to the three mentioned factors, we realized that they are rooted in the structures and cultural beliefs of residents and are abstract and subjective. The next two factors (official trust and official participation) somehow are related to the previous three factors. According to the findings, we can say that in Mashhad central region, subjective factors such as public participation, awareness of civil rights and public trust, have the greatest impact on social capital. Objective factors such as official trust and official participation are under the influence of them. This means that with the improvement of subjective factors, objective factors will also improve. Keywords: social capital, factor analysis, participation, Mashhad central region.