بررسي رويكرد احزاب سياسي اسراييل نسبت به برنامه هسته اي ايران

Basic Orientations of Likud Party toward Iranʹʹs Nuclear Program

امروزه با افزايش روند استفاده از انرژي هسته اي، شاهد افزايش فشارهاي بين‌المللي از سوي نهادهاي قانوني و كشورهاي قدرتمند هسته اي براي انحصاري كردن اين فناوري هستيم كه سبب ايجاد رقابت‌هاي هسته اي در جهان و البته محدوديت‌هاي تبعيض آميز در اين روند شده است. در اين رابطه مي توان از مناقشه هسته اي ايران ياد كرد كه طي دهه گذشته موضوع اكثر محافل سياسي در جهان بوده است. در اين ميان، اسراييل با قلمداد كردن اين موضوع به‌عنوان يكي از چالش‌هاي جديد امنيتي خود در تلاش است تا با طرح اتهاماتي همچون غيرصلح‌آميز بودن فعاليت‌هاي ايران، حمايت جهاني را براي تامين امنيت خويش فراهم كند. اين مقاله با بهره گيري از روش توصيفي- تحليلي مي كوشد تا به بررسي مقايسه اي رويكرد احزاب اسراييل نسبت به برنامه هسته اي ايران بپردازد. يافته هاي مقاله حاكي از آن است كه حزب ليكود داراي رويكردي تهاجمي و نظامي محور بوده است و در مقابل، حزب كاديما داراي رويكردي محتاطانه و همسو با جامعه جهاني است.

Nowadays despite the undeniable role of parties in the politics, it’s not negligible the effect of these groups in policy area. Israel by having a government structure of parliamentary republic, it is one of the countries that the role of parties is very effective in it, so that the main political orientations of this regime is affected by the approaches of its powerful parties. On the other hand by creating of Iran Nuclear Dispute in 2002, studying about the effect of ruling parties of this regime on Iranian nuclear issue that as one of the security issues of this regime that was on top security challenges at past decade, it’s very important. In this regard, study of basic orientations of Likud party as the powerful party of this regime to the Iranian nuclear issue is subject of this article that studied during the interval of time 2002 to 2014 and somehow, it will respond the main research question. In this way, the purpose of this research is to answer this question. Descriptive analytical methods have been used for finding the result. Article findings suggest that except for the leader ship of Ariel Sharon (2001-2006) that was cautious collision in the case of Iran, the main orientation of the party in the period of the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu (2006 until now), has been radical and military stances, that among which can be noted objections of this party to the Geneva Agreement, the formation of cabinet war against Iran and etc.