شماره ركورد :
811642
عنوان مقاله :
ارزيابي آسيب پذيري نواحي روستايي از خطر زلزله (مطالعه موردي: بخش مركزي شهرستان مرند)
عنوان فرعي :
Vulnerability Assessment of Rural Areas’ Regarding Earthquake Risk (Case Study: The Central District of Marand County)
پديد آورندگان :
ظاهري ، محمد نويسنده دانشيار جغرافيا و برنامه ريزي روستايي، دانشگاه تبريز Zaheri, Mohammad , آقاياري هير، محسن نويسنده استاديار جغرافيا و برنامه ريزي روستايي، دانشگاه تبريز Aghayari Hir, Mohsen , ذاكري مياب، كلثوم نويسنده كارشناسي ارشد جغرافيا و برنامه ريزي روستايي، دانشگاه تبريز Zakeri Miab, Kolsoom
اطلاعات موجودي :
فصلنامه سال 1394 شماره 9
رتبه نشريه :
علمي پژوهشي
تعداد صفحه :
15
از صفحه :
97
تا صفحه :
111
كليدواژه :
TOPSIS technique , Vulnerability , آسيب پذيري , تكنيك TOPSIS , بلاياي طبيعي , شهرستان مرند , نواحي روستايي , Marand County , Natural Disasters , Rural Areas
چكيده فارسي :
هدف: بلاياي طبيعي و از آن جمله وقوع زلزله در اغلب موارد، تاثيرات مخربي بر سكونتگاه‌هاي انساني داشته و تلفات سنگين جاني و مالي بر ساكنان آن وارد مي سازد. زير ساخت هاي نامناسب واحدهاي سكونتگاهي روستايي و نابرابري‌هاي اجتماعي- اقتصادي موجود ميان شهرها و روستاها، باعث نابساماني فضايي در شبكه سكونتگاهي كشور شده و آسيب پذيري آن‌ها را در مقابل بلاياي طبيعي، به‌طور مداوم افزايش داده است. با توجه به موقعيت كشور و نحوه قرارگيري روستاها در نقاط آسيب-پذير از زلزله، توجه جدي به اين مسيله، ضرورت دارد. اين پژوهش باهدف بررسي و تحليل آسيب پذيري سكونتگاه‌هاي روستايي بخش مركزي شهرستان مرند صورت گرفت. روش: اين پژوهش ازلحاظ هدف كاربردي و با روش توصيفي- تحليلي صورت گرفت. داده هاي موردنياز از مطالعات كتابخانه-اي و داده هاي مركز آمار ايران 1390 گردآوري شده اند. جامعه آماري اين تحقيق شامل 74 روستاي بخش مركزي شهرستان مرند مي باشد كه به صورت تمام شماري مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. در اين راستا به‌منظور وزن دهي شاخص‌ها به نظرسنجي از نخبگان با استفاده از تكنيك AHP اقدام شده و جهت ارزيابي آسيب پذيري و رتبه بندي سكونتگاه هاي روستايي از تكنيك TOPSIS استفاده گرديد. در اين راستا جهت پردازش داده ها و استخراج وضعيت برخي از شاخص هاي مورد استفاده و نيز نمايش نتايج، سيستم اطلاعات جغرافيايي (GIS) مورد توجه بوده است. يافته ها: نتايج تحقيق حاكي از آسيب پذيري بالا و خيلي بالا در بيش از 30 درصد روستاهاي محدوده مورد مطالعه بوده كه از بعد كالبدي- فضايي، 33/29 درصد روستاها و از بعد اجتماعي- اقتصادي، 44 درصد روستاها، آسيب پذيري بالا و خيلي بالايي دارند. محدوديت ها/راهبردها: ناقص بودن داده هاي مربوط به روستاها از چالش‌هاي مطالعه حاضر مي باشد. راهكارهاي عملي: با عنايت به اين مطلب كه آسيب پذيري محدوده مورد مطالعه بيشتر متاثر از آسيب پذيري كالبدي-فضايي است، اين امر نيازمند ايجاد تغيير در ويژگي‌هاي كالبدي- فضايي منطقه مورد مطالعه در جهت بهبود وضعيت به-منظور كاهش آسيب پذيري مي باشد. اصالت و ارزش: پژوهش حاضر در مقايسه با مطالعات صورت گرفته، به دنبال ارايه الگويي مناسب براي محاسبه آسيب پذيري با رويكرد فازي بر اساس شاخص‌هاي ابعاد كالبدي و ابعاد اجتماعي-اقتصادي است.
چكيده لاتين :
1. INTRODUCTION Natural disasters including earthquakes often have devastating effects on human settlements and make heavy losses of life and property of its inhabitants. Poor infrastructures of human settlements and socio-economic disparities between rural and urban areas have caused chaos in the settelment network of the country and has increased their vunerability in the face of natural disasters.. Due to our countrie’s position and the position of villages in the earthquake vunerable areas, serious attention to this problem is needed. 2. THEORETICAL FRAMWORK Vulnerability can be described as a lack of security against environmental threats. It results from a combination of processes that shape the degree of exposure to a hazard, sensitivity to its stress and impacts, and resilience in the face of those effects. All people, ecosystems, and regions confronting environmental or socio-economic stresses are potentially vulnerable to the impacts, of environmental hazards, but the level of vulnerability varies widely. According to the conceptual framework of vulnerability, recognizes and builds upon the three major dimensions of vulnerability exposure, sensitivity, and adaptation/resilience. The vulnerability of a particular community or livelihood system is a function of three main factors: - Exposure–the nature and extent of changes to which a place’s climate is subjected to including changes in climate variability, hereunder the magnitude and frequency of extreme events. - Sensitivity–how systems can be either positively or negatively affected by the change in climate. - Adaptive capacity–how much capability a society has to adapt to the changes so as to maintain, minimize loss of, or maximize a gain in welfare. The vulnerability of settlements or communities may be described as the extent to which a settlement system is exposed and sensitive to negative implications of change, and the degree to which the subject community is able to anticipate, resist, cope with, adapt, or recover etc. The vulnerability of settlement systems, thus, includes not only susceptibility to physical changes, but more importantly the impact that such changes may have on social, economic, and ecological subsystems and processes on which communities are dependant. Vulnerability is caused by a complex combination of socio-economic, physical, environmental, and political root causes, dynamic pressure and unsafe conditions. Political and economic ideologies affect the allocation and distribution of resources in a society, and are therefore the root causes of vulnerability. Dynamic pressures are the immediate manifestation of the underlying patterns and refer, among others, to population density and growth, unplanned urbanization, inappropriate land use, environmental mismanagement, social injustice, and poverty. 3. METHODOLOGY The research population of this study is 74 villages of the central district of Marand County. In this regard, TOPSIS technique and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) were used. Also, AHP method was used for weighting the layers. According to previous studies, important and effective parameters the vulnerability caused by earthquakes in rural areas that in this research was used, included settlements texture (compression – open), the suitability of road network, settlements intensity, population density, female ratio, illiteracy ratio, population growth ratio, employment rate and economic activity, distance from health centers, vulnerable groups ratio (under 15 and over 65 years), household size, access to facilities, and health centers. 4. DISCUSSION According to the country’s location and villageʹs situation in vulnerable areas of the earthquake, serious attention to this problem is required. In a rural settlement, the awareness of vulnerability before the crisis is extremely important in determining the directions of future development and prevention from irreparable human and financial losses. The purpose of this study is analysis of the vulnerability of rural settlements in the central district of Marand County. 5. CONCLUSION Calculation of villageʹs vulnerability in this study indicated that 27.03% of the villages have medium vulnerability and 33.79% of villages have high and very high vulnerability in the study area. Investigation of the vulnerability of rural settlements in the region, indicated the vulnerability of medium, high, and very high at more than 59 percent of the rural population in the study area. From the physical-spatial dimension, 29/33% of the villages and from the socio-economic dimension, 44% of the villages have high and very high vulnerability and this is a serious threat to the increasing risk in the study area.
سال انتشار :
1394
عنوان نشريه :
پژوهش و برنامه ريزي روستايي
عنوان نشريه :
پژوهش و برنامه ريزي روستايي
اطلاعات موجودي :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 9 سال 1394
كلمات كليدي :
#تست#آزمون###امتحان
لينک به اين مدرک :
بازگشت