تحليل توقيت ظهور حضرت مهدي در روايت ابولبيد «بازنمايي ترفند بهائيت در استناد به يك روايت»

An Analysis of Fixing Time for Imam Mahdis Appearance in Abu Labids Tradition (disclosing Bahaes Trick in Referring to a Tradition)

روايت ابولبيد در بيان رمز و راز حروف مقطعه قرآن، به قيام قائماني هنگام تحقق حروف مقطعه فواتح سور اشاره دارد. در اين روايت، ظهور حضرت حجت را در تحقق «الر» يا «المر» دانسته است. علامه مجلسي در بحار الانوار چند احتمال را در مراد روايت بيان كرده و در كتاب رجعت دچار توقيت احتمالي گشته، سال 1155ق. را سال ظهور احتمالي تعيين مي كند. از سوي ديگر، اين روايت مي تواند خاستگاهي براي سوءبرداشت ها باشد؛ چنان‏كه فرقه بهائيت به‏وسيله ابوالفضل گلپايگاني، اين روايت را دليلي بر حقانيت ادعاي علي‏محمد شيرازي ملقب به باب در سال 1260ق دانسته است. راقم اين سطور با روش توصيفي ـ تحليلي درصدد تبيين محتوايي و سندي اين روايت است. يافته‏هاي تحقيق نشان مي دهد اين روايت كه دچار ضعف سند و دلالت است، در امر خطير امامت (يا نبوت ادعايي) قابل استناد نيست و در صورت استناد، كاملاً مطابق بر حضرت مهدي است.

Explaining the Muqattaat or abbreviated lettes of Quran, Abu Labids tradition alludes to those who up-rise when abbreviated letters in beginning of Quranic chapters are realized. According to this tradition, Imam Mahdi appears when alif lam ra or alif lam mim ra are realized. In his Behar al-Anwar, Allama Majlisi says that there are some probabilities concerning the meaning of this tradition. In his Rijat Book, he however happens to fix a probable time for the Imams appearance saying that 1155 AH is the time he will probably appear. This tradition can serve as a ground for some misunderstandings. Abu al-Fazl Gulpayagani a leading figure of Bahaei sect considers this tradition as a reason why Ali Muhammad Shirazi known as Bab was right when he claimed that he was the promised Mahdi appearing in 1260 AH. Using a descriptive analytic methodology, the writer tries to explain the content of this tradition as well as its chain of reporters. This study shows that this tradition is weak both in terms its reporters as well as in terms of its signification. Thus it cannot be referred to in important matters such as imamate (or alleged prophecy). If this tradition is trusted at all, it can be referred only to Imam Mahdi