شماره ركورد :
901816
عنوان مقاله :
بنيان «دولت حزب‌سالار» و تعامل ميان دموكراسي و پارتيتوكراسي
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
Partitocratic state (Party Oriented State) and the reaction between Democracy & Partitocracy
پديد آورندگان :
طباطبايي، محمد نويسنده دانشگاه علامه طباطبائي,ايران Tabatabaei, Mohammad
اطلاعات موجودي :
فصلنامه سال 1394 شماره 3
رتبه نشريه :
علمي پژوهشي
تعداد صفحه :
47
از صفحه :
33
تا صفحه :
79
كليدواژه :
تحزب , دموكراسي , دولت حزب سالار , پلوراليسم سياسي , پارتيتوكراتي
چكيده فارسي :
در غرب، احزاب سياسي در راستاي دموكراسيزاسيون و ليبراليزاسيون جوامع به‌وجود آمده‌اند و شكل‌گيري نظام حزبي، مرحله‌اي اساسي در فرآيند توسعه سياسي به‌حساب مي‌آيد. اعتقاد بر آن است كه پلوراليسم سياسي در نظام‌هاي ليبرال ـ دموكراتيك، صرفاً در تحزب سياسي و رقابت مسالمت‌آميز ميان احزاب براي كسب قدرت خلاصه مي‌شود. امروزه تحزب جزو جدايي‌ناپذيري از حيات سياسي غرب است. اگر نبودِ احزاب سياسي، خللي در دموكراسي به‌حساب آيد؛ بودن آن‌ها نيز سدي در مقابل پلوراليسم سياسي به‌حساب مي‌آيد چرا كه در حال حاضر، تكثرگرايي سياسي در غرب، به رقابت ميان احزاب دولتي خاصي محدود شده است كه با تحميل اراده سياسي خود، قادر به تأمين مردم‌سالاري واقعي نيستند. احزاب دولتي در حقيقت، با تمركز قدرت در دست خود، برابري فرصت‌ها و تساوي امكانات و مجال قدرت‌يابي را از ساير جريانات و گروه‌هاي سياسي سلب كرده و مانع از گردش پيوسته و واقعي قدرت مي‌شوند. اگر در ابتداي امر، تحزب همزاد نظام ليبرال ـ دموكراتيك بوده است، با افزايش نقش و قدرت احزاب سياسي و نهادينگي آن‌ها، حكومت مردم بر مردم، به‌تدريج جاي خود را به حاكميت احزاب مي‌دهد. برهان اصلي پژوهش حاضر بر روي اين فرضيه قرار گرفته است كه «دولتي‌ شدن فزاينده‌ي احزاب سياسي» و «حزبي‌ شدن دولت‌هاي غربي» باعث ايجاد «دولت حزب سالار» و در نتيجه، به چالش كشيده‌ شدن «دموكراسي» از سوي «پارتيتوكراسي» شده است. در عصر حاضر، تفكر و انديشه‌هاي فردي و جمعي، جاي خود را به شعور حزبي داده‌اند و اراده مردمي و ملي، به اراده حزبي بدل شده است. در نتيجه امروزه تعيين‌ كننده سياست ملي و سياست ملت، احزاب سياسي كه به بخشي از دولت‌ها تبديل شده‌اند و دولت‌هايي كه در احزاب سياسي خلاصه شده‌اند، هستند و اين امري است كه از آن با عنوان بنيان «دولت حزب سالار» ياد مي‌شود.
چكيده لاتين :
Purpose: A fundamental salubrious feature of western liberal democratic system of government is political parties which compete for power. Parties in western liberal democracies are crucial in that the political systems are divided into different bipartisan, singleparty, and multiparty categories according to criteria as number of parties, role and special functions, and interactions among parties. The sheer diversity of the parties and ideological rift, which are closely related, indicates the health and vitality of the democratic system. With this in mind, it is argued that political behavior and competition in elections are interpreted in a framework informed by a single most important entity, i.e., political party. In the third millennium, with party system and political success and stability of states tightly associated, a question looming around relates the new mechanizations of democracy and party system. This is the major focus of the present article. Design/Methodology/Approach: To achieve the major focus of the present article which is an attempt to provide some answers to the above questions through bringing into the light issues as democracy and party system, the place and role of parties in legislative process in western democracies, power transition between parties, and typology of political parties, in a qualitative undertaking. Findings: In West, political parties are formed due to democratization and liberalization processes of the societies and formation of party system is an essential stage in political development trend. It is believed that in liberaldemocratic systems, political pluralism is abridged in political partisanship and peaceful competition among parties for gaining power. If, nowadays partisanship is an inseparable element of western political life, however it has not completely responded towards requirements and could be problem in democracy, their presence could be also considered as a barrier against political pluralism because today, political pluralism is limited to competition of certain state parties which are not able to provide real democracy due to burdening their political will on national and nation’s will. Actually, state parties foreclose equality of opportunities and parity of facilities and accordingly, chance of any kind of power from other political groups and biases and thus prevent continues and real flow of power by concentrating power in their own hands. If partisanship has been dual of liberaldemocratic system at first, however, according to enhancement of role and power of political parties and their internalization, democracy or ruling of people on people is gradually replaced by ruling of parties. Originality/Value: The main logic of the present research is laid on the hypothesis that “increasing governmental political parties” and “partisanship of western governments” has caused the establishment of “partitocratic state (party oriented state)” and challenging “democracy” by “partitocracy”. In present era, individual and plural thoughts are replaced by party reasoning and national and public will is turned to party will. Therefore, today, national politics and policy of the nation are prescribed by political parties which are turned to part of governments, and those governments which are abridged in political parties. This process is called as foundation of “partitocratic state (party oriented state)” in western communities.
سال انتشار :
1394
عنوان نشريه :
دولت پژوهي
عنوان نشريه :
دولت پژوهي
اطلاعات موجودي :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 3 سال 1394
كلمات كليدي :
#تست#آزمون###امتحان
لينک به اين مدرک :
بازگشت