پديد آورندگان :
فاضلي، بهاره نويسنده دانشكده علوم,گروه زمين شناسي,دانشگاه اصفهان,ايران Fazeli, Bahareh , خليلي، محمود نويسنده دانشكده علوم,گروه زمين شناسي,دانشگاه اصفهان,ايران Khalili, Mahmoud , بيورز، روي نويسنده بخش علوم زمين,دانشگاه متوديست جنوبي,امريكا Beavers, Roy , منصوري اصفهاني، مهين نويسنده دانشكده مهندسي معدن,دانشگاه صنعتي اصفهان,ايران Mansouri Esfahani, Mahin , لقماني دستجردي، زهرا نويسنده گروه زمين شناسي,دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد دولت آباد,ايران Loghmani Dastjerdi, Zahra
چكيده لاتين :
Introduction
The generation and evolution of granitic magmas has been a hot debated subject among petrologists. The diversity of their origin has led different authors to propose that these rocks are not simple in their origin and might be generated in more ways than one. In the past several decades, many petrologists used a variety characteristics to subdivide the granitoid rocks. Such proposals have of course been forward by Chappell and White (1974) for the granitoids of Eastern Australia. They divided these granitoids into two distinct types (Iand Stype granitic rocks), which they interpreted as being derived from igneous and sedimentary source rocks, respectively. The Ghaleh Yaghmesh plutonic massif is located in the most western part of Yazd and it forms a part of the UrumiehDokhtar magmatic belt. The belt is response to subduction of NeoTethyan oceanic crust beneath central Iran (Alavi, 1994). During CretaceousLate Tertiary, numerous granitoid bodies were exposed in this belt, many of which have been studied by a number of workers (e.g. Sepahi and Malvandi, 2008; Honarmand et al., 2013; Kananian et al., 2014).
The massif composed of diorite, quartzdiorite, tonalite, granodiorite and granite (Oligocene) intruded into the Eocene volcanic and pyroclastic rocks including rhyolite, rhyodacite, andesitic, rhyodacitic and rhyolitic tuff. The main purpose of the present paper is to describe the petrography, and whole rock geochemistry of the Ghaleh Yaghmish granitoids as well as discussing their petrogenetic and tectonic significance in the light of the regional geological framework of the study area.
Materials and methods
After field studies and sampling, fifty thin sections were prepared for petrographic study. Twentyone fresh samples were selected for XRF chemical analysis performed at the Southern Methodist University (Dallas USA). Thin polished sections of granodiorite rocks were prepared for composition determining and structure formula calculation of amphibole minerals by Cameca SX50 microprobe device at the Oklahomacity University (Norman USA).
Results
The studied plutonic rocks are dominated by plagioclase, orthoclase, quartz, amphibole (magnesio hornblende and actinolite hornblende), biotite, and pyroxene. Zircon, apatite, sphene, tourmaline and opaque minerals as the common accessory and chlorite, epidote and calcite are the secondary minerals. On the base of petrographic observation as well as mineralchemistry and geochemical data, the granitoid massif is classified as Itype (magnetite series), calc – alkaline and metaluminous composition. The rocks under discussion are characterized by the high level of LILE (Ba, Sr, K and Cs) and the negative anomaly of HFS elements (Ti, Nb, Zr and Y) indicating the subduction related magmatism. The Ghaleh Yaghmesh granitoids are cogenetic and possibly developed in subduction zone related to active continental margin calc – alkaline volcanic arcs. Mixing process of acidic and basic magmas is likely involved in generation of the rocks being studied.
Discussion
The parent magma probably formed by partial melting of amphibolites with some sedimentary materials. Fractional crystallization of melt in the higher levels of crust gave rise to various rock types. Mantle – derived basaltic magmas emplaced into the lower crust most likely provide heat for partial melting )Clemens et al., 2011(. Field evidences such as the presence of mafic microgranular enclaves having sharp boundaries with the host rocks (Zorpi et al., 1989; Didier, 1991), petrographic observations (similar mineralogy of MME and the host rock (Didier, 1991; Didier and Barbarin, 1991), the occurrence of accicular apatite (Zorpi et al., 1989; Didier, 1991), the corroded margin of amphibole and plagioclase (Zorpi et al., 1989; Shelley, 1993) and the abundance of biotite and hornblende in MME compared to the host rock (Ellis and Thompson, 1986)) and geochemical criteria (range of silica from 51.35 to 70.78) indicate that magma mixing process was likely responsible for the formation of the rocks being studied.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the University of Isfahan for the financial support. We also thank the Southern Methodist University (SMU) (Dallas USA) for the XRF chemical analysis undertaken for this project.
References
Alavi, M., 1994. Tectonics of Zagros orogenic belt of Iran, new data and interpretation. Tectonophysics, 229(3): 211–238.
Chappell, B.W. and White, A.J., 1974. Two contrasting granite types. Pacific Geology, 8: 173174.
Clemens, J.D., Stevens G., and Farina, F., 2011. The enigmatic sources of Itype granites: The peritectic conexión. Lithos, 126(3): 174–181.
Didier, J., 1991. The main types of enclaves in the Hercynian granitoids of the Massif Central, France. In: J. Didier and B. Barbarin (Editors), Enclaves and Granite Petrology. Developments in Petrology, V. 13. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 47–61.
Didier, J. and Barbarin, B., 1991. Enclaves and granite petrology.Developments in Petrology, V. 13. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 625 pp.
Ellis, D.J. and Thompson, A.B., 1986. Subsolidus and partial melting reactions in the quartzexcess and water deficient conditions of peraluminous melts from mafic rocks. Journal of Petrology, 27(1): 91121.
Honarmand, M., RashidnejadOmran, N., Corfu , F., Emami, M. H. and Nabatian, G., 2013. Geochronology and magmatic history of a calcalkaline plutonic complex in the UrumiehDokhtar Magmatic Belt, Central Iran: Zircon ages as evidence for two major plutonic episodes. Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie, Abhandlungen, 190(1): 67–77.
Kananian, A., Sarjoughian, F., Nadimi A., Ahmadian, J. and Ling, W., 2014. Geochemical characteristics of the Kuhe Dom intrusion, Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Arc (Iran): Implications for source regions and magmatic evolution. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 90: 137148.
Sepahi, A.A. and Malvandi, F., 2008. Petrology of the Bouein ZahraNaein Plutonic Complexes, UrumiehDokhtar Belt, Iran: With Special Reference to Granitoids of the Saveh Plutonic Complex. Neues Jahrbuch für MineralogieAbhandlungen. Journal of Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 185(1): 99–115.
Shelley, D., 1993. Igneous and metamorphic rocks under the microscope. Chapman and Hall, London, 630 pp.
Zorpi, M.J., Coulon, C., Orisini, J.B. and Concirta, C., 1989. Magma mingling, zoning and emplacement in calkalkaline granitoid plutons. Tectonophysics, 157(4): 315326.
