شماره ركورد :
911996
عنوان مقاله :
واكاوي روش تأويلي ابن‌رشد
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics
پديد آورندگان :
پارسا، عليرضا نويسنده گروه فلسفه,دانشگاه پيام نور,ايران Parsa, Alireza
اطلاعات موجودي :
دوفصلنامه سال 1395 شماره 19
رتبه نشريه :
علمي پژوهشي
تعداد صفحه :
18
از صفحه :
115
تا صفحه :
132
كليدواژه :
دين , فلسفه , : Kant , critical view , linguistic meaningfulness , Metaphysics , تأويل , nonlinguistic meaninglessness , ابن رشد
چكيده فارسي :
مسأله تأويل در منظومه انديشه ابن­رشد جايگاه ويژه‌اي دارد، اين مسأله كليد حل تعارض دين و فلسفه، نشان دهنده نادرستي نسبت كفر به فلاسفه و عامل فهم و تبيين نصوص ديني است. از نظر ابن­رشد تأويل گذر از معناي ظاهري و پي بردن به مقصود باطني متن است. روش تأويلي ابن­رشد، براساس مذهب جمع است وي تلاش درجمع ميان عقل و وحي و دين و فلسفه دارد. بر اين اساس براي تأويل ضوابطي ارائه مي­دهد و تصريح مي­كند، فلاسفه كه داراي روش برهاني هستند شايسته تأويل متون ديني هستند اما اجازه اشاعه آن را در ميان مردم ندارند.
چكيده لاتين :
One of the most important questions on Kant’s philosophy is the meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics. This article tries to answer two questions on Kant’s philosophy: 1      Is the metaphysics, in the philosophy of Kant, meaningful or meaningless? 2 Is the meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics, for Kant, so important for contemporary philosophy? In this paper, firstly, I argue that we can call Kant’s approach to Metaphysics not as a linguistic one (including; language metaphysics, philosophy of language, philosophy of ordinary language or linguistics) but it is a transcendental epistemology. Secondly, in terms of problembased, the meaningfulness or meaninglessness of metaphysics not only is not the basic problem of Kant, but his philosophy in a clear, distinct and independent manner, involves not such an issue. Thirdly, on the problem of the meaningfulness and meaninglessness of metaphysics, it could be accepted that Kant's philosophy seems to have the backgrounds, indications, and implications For the second question, it could be distinguished two levels of meaningfulness or meaningless in Kant's philosophy: linguistic and nonlinguistic levels. The linguistic level are considered from two directions, i.e., the parts or components (words and metaphysical propositions) and the whole (as the science of metaphysics). In the linguistic level, in one hand, I argue that the metaphysical words or propositions are not meaningless, but on the other hand, the proposition that “Metaphysics is a science” is a meaningless proposition. In the nonlinguistic level, metaphysics due to not reaching to the ends and goals seems meaninglessness as well.
سال انتشار :
1395
عنوان نشريه :
پژوهشهاي فلسفي- دانشگاه تبريز
عنوان نشريه :
پژوهشهاي فلسفي- دانشگاه تبريز
اطلاعات موجودي :
دوفصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 19 سال 1395
كلمات كليدي :
#تست#آزمون###امتحان
لينک به اين مدرک :
بازگشت