بررسي اشتراط تنجيز در عقود و ايقاعات

"Non-suspension" as a condition for mutual and unilateral contracts

اين پژوهش با هدف بررسي اشتراط تنجيز در عقود و ايقاعات انجام گرفته است، به اين معنا كه معلق كردن عقد يا ايقاع به امر ديگري، موجب بطلان آن مي‌شود. بعضي از فقها با دلايلي اثبات كرده‌اند كه تعليق، مبطل قراردادها، اعم از عقد و ايقاع است. در اين پژوهش، دلايل اشتراط تنجيز به چالش كشيده شده است و اثبات شد كه همه آن دلايل هر يك به نحوي مخدوش است و مسيله رجوع تعليق به انشا يا منشا هم تاثيري در حكم آن ندارد.

This study aims to examine the issue of considering "non-suspension "as a condition for mutual and unilateral contracts. This study has gathered the different narrative and intellectual reasons presented by Jurists and as the useless divisions have been omitted, the new classifications have been presented and evaluated. Some of the Jurists have presented evidences that "suspension" shall invalidate the contracts. This research has challenged the reasons which consider "non-suspension "as a condition for mutual and unilateral contracts, and proves that many of them are not complete. The most important reason for them is the Consensus, but we have proved that the Consensus also cannot be an enough reason for this matter.