شواهدي بر اصالت وجود در تفكر ابن‌سينا از منظر حكمت متعاليه

Evidence on the Presence of the Principiality of Existence in Ibn Sina’s Thoughts in the Viewpoint of the Transcendent Philosophy

اصالت وجود، مبناي حكمت متعاليه است و ملاصدرا اين اصل را با ادله محكم به اثبات رسانده و ساير اصول فلسفه‌اش را بر آن بنا كرده است. هر چند اين مسيله در زمان ابن‌سينا مطرح نبوده ولي اين سوال قابل طرح است كه آيا ميتوان آنرا در عبارات شيخ‌الرييس رديابي نمود؟ آيا ميتوان شواهدي قوي بر اثبات اين اصل در تفكر سينوي يافت، بنحوي كه مجالي براي قرايت اصالت ماهيتي از تفكر وي وجود نداشته باشد؟ هدف اين تحقيق، ارايه شواهدي محكم بر اصالت وجودي بودن تفكر سينوي بوده و قصد دارد كه با مراجعه به عبارات ملاصدرا و ابن‌سينا اين مطلب را تقويت نمايد. ملاصدرا در تاييد اصالت وجود مورد نظر خويش، به عبارات شيخ‌الرييس استناد ميجويد. بسياري از آرا ابن‌سينا مستلزم اصالت وجود است. علاوه بر اين، نصوصي نيز بر اين مطلب در بيانات او وجود دارد. شواهد مذكور به فراخور و مجال اين تحقيق، ارايه و مدعا تبيين خواهد شد.

The principiality of existence is the basis of the Transcendent Philosophy. Mulla Sadra has demonstrated this principle based on solid arguments and used it as the foundation of his other philosophical principles. Although this issue was not raised in the time of Ibn Sina, one could ask if it could be traced in his words. Another related question here is whether any sound evidence demonstrating the existence of this principle could be found in Ibn Sina’s thoughts so that there would remain no excuse for interpreting his philosophy based on the principiality of quiddity. This study is intended to provide a number of strong proofs in favor of the considerable influence of the principiality of existence on Sinan philosophy through resorting to the statements made by Mulla Sadra and Ibn Sina. In order to confirm his intended principiality of existence, Mulla Sadra refers to Ibn Sina’s words. In fact, many of his views reveal his belief in the principiality of existence, and there are some direct references to this point in his works. Here, the author will try to present and explain the proofs testifying to the truth of this claim within the borderlines of the conducted study.